The Acts, Sedition, Smith, Espionage, and Patriot

The stifling of American citizen’s freedom of speech by the U.S. Government is not a new concept in the history of our country. I suspect that the many people in this country have not a clue as to what the following examples are or what drove their inception.
In 1798 congress passed the “Sedition Acts”. Making it an offense punishable by a fine or imprisonment, to write, print, utter, publish, or procure any false, scandalous, or malicious writings against the government of the United States, either house of Congress, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame or irritate the heck out of them.

The Espionage Act in 1917 made it punishable to interfering with military recruitment and its amendment (Sedition Act of 1918) a year later added “… utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States…”.

In the Smith Act of 1940 once again citizens are subject to fines and imprisonment “…for willfully . . . with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or. . . “. It is still around you can read it 18 U.S. Code § 2385

Two weeks before the Alien & Sedition Acts passed On June 1, 1798 Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to his friend John Taylor.

“This is not new,” Jefferson said. “It is the old practice of despots; to use a part of the people to keep the rest in order. And those who have once got an ascendancy and possessed themselves of all the resources of the nation, their revenues and offices, have immense means for retaining their advantage.”

Jefferson did what he could to stop his generations Patriot Acts but failed.

1984 Plus 20 Years Signs of the Times

War is Peace 1984 sign

“I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we’re really talking about peace.” Bush at the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Washington, D.C.
June 18, 2002, 10:30 A.M. EDT

ignorance is strength sign

freedom is slavery

Big Brother is watching sign

Society based upon the principles of Ingsoc and its very wise ideals of the Philosopher Big Brother. Our mission is to show our support to the Government in its actions to bring about the Utopia presented by George Orwell in 1984! This includes War on all those who oppose us, because War is Peace. Censorship, such as Chaney talks abou the policy, because Ignorance is Strength. And the wonderful Patriot Act, because Freedom is Slavery! As a member of our glorious society you will know yourself to be safe because Big Brother is watching out for you in 1984 + 20.

Any reports of failure are almost certainly lies, the work of thought criminals. Kindly ignore them.

thoughtpolice turn in poster

.

Democracy Iraqi Style – Now Butt Out

The Iraqi government was elected while a few hundred thousand or so foreign troops moved around their country shooting and blowing up anything that moved. Is that how we envision democracy at work?

Americans don’t get that our dreams of Democracy are not necessarily the Democratic ideals that Iraqi’s envision. There are underlying ideologies which lead to a sectarian division. When I say I am an American, it is not inclusive of a religious doctrine. The election was held. Now the American Ambassador issued a warning stating that we are not going to use our resources to support sectarian goals.

I would think that the continued chaos keeps most Iraqis freaked out enough stay in their houses if they can. The kidnapping of foreigners keeps other onlookers away because of fear. The Death Squads stifle meaningful opposition. The suicide and car bombings churn the civil upheaval between the Shittes and Sunni.

Speaking after talks with British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who echoed the U.S. ambassador’s call for a government of national unity, the normally calm and diplomatic Jaafari, a Shi’ite Islamist, said Iraq knew its own best interests.

“When someone asks us whether we want a sectarian government the answer is ‘no we do not want a sectarian government’ — not because the U.S. ambassador says so or issues a warning,” he told a news conference.

“We do not need anybody to remind us, thank you.” Reuters

Friday, the governor of the province of Karbala in the Shiite south announced that he was suspending all dealings with American troops and barring them from government buildings for “behaving irresponsibly.” IHT

Hello, do you hear butt out . . .

Dubai Company Taking Over Operations in Major U.S. Ports Not Smart for America

My major point of contention in this deal is not that the company is UAE owned but that it is NOT USA owned.

A private company in Britain has managed major ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia. Now, a UAE-owned company called Dubai Ports World is buying the London Company, which will put Dubai Ports World in charge of the U.S. ports. I wrote about the effort to repeal the Jones Act (Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 requiring that all cargo moving between U.S. ports be carried in ships which are U.S.-owned, -built and -crewed) in the 90’s. What I believed then still holds true for me today. We need to stop the outsourcing of our country to the highest bidder.

We are not considering who gives us tech help, who made the shirt we wear; we are discussing a major method of transportation of goods, services, and military supplies for our country. There is an inherent danger in this decision. Call me an alarmist if you wish, but, control of our ports is essential to our economy, security, and military capabilities. Our ports are vital to our economy and to the international economy. That makes them top terrorist targets. We do not outsource military and law enforcement operations and duties. Why hand our port operations over.

As far as the UAE and Dubai go, I do not know much about their country. Dubai is the second largest emirate and commercial capital of the United Arab Emirates. The capital of UAE is Abu Dhabi, the largest emirate; the other members of the federation in addition to Abu Dhabi and Dubai are Sharjah, Ajman, Umm Al Quwain, Ras Al Khaimah and Fujairah. Known until 1971 as the Trucial States, each of which had separate treaty relationships with Britain, the seven emirates came together to establish a federal state officially entitled Dawlat al Imarat al Arabiyya al Muttahida (State of the United Arab Emirates). Each of the component emirates of the Federation already had its own existing institutions of government and to provide for the effective governing of the new state, the Rulers agreed to draw up a provisional Constitution specifying those powers which we re to be allocated to new federal institutions, all others remaining the prerogative of the individual emirates. The new federal system of government included a Supreme Council, a Cabinet or Council of Ministers, a parliamentary body, the Federal National Council and an independent judiciary, at the peak of which is the Federal Supreme Court.

Here are a couple of pictures from The Dubai International Convention Center web site. I can not come to know a people by looking at pictures and web sites but it is a start to understanding.

trade center dubai

club in dubai
If only I could recreate in such a place
Here is a flash presentation with a map from the site.

The DP World team is set to explain that the P&O business controls only the leases of container terminals at the ports. It says security at the ports is mainly the responsibility of outside bodies, including the US Coast Guard. News FT.com

All Arabs are not terrorists. All American’s are not like Timothy McVeigh. Regardless, it is not in our countries best interests, to allow our ports operations be handled by a foreign country. It is a legal failure that needs to be dealt with.